UCS-2 is the trivial 16-bit Unicode encoding. It was defined in versions of Unicode prior to 2.0, and is now considered to be obsolete.
UCS-2 was at one time the only popular Unicode encoding, so there was little need to distinguish between the terms Unicode and UCS-2. If an old format specification says that text is encoded in "Unicode", it probably means UCS-2.
There may be some disagreement about precisely what "UCS-2" means. Besides the original definition, it could mean the encoding with surrogate pairs allowed (see below), or it could be an old name for the encoding whose current version is UTF-16.
The terms UCS-2 and UTF-16 are sometimes used interchangeably, even though they really shouldn't be. However, the data formats do end up being identical in many real-world situations.
UCS-2 encodes a sequence of Unicode code points in a sequence of unsigned 16-bit integers, one code point per integer, in the obvious way (U+0000=0x0000, U+0001=0x0001, ..., U+FFFF=0xffff). It is only capable of encoding code points up to U+FFFF, and does not support the higher code points (U+10000 through U+10FFFF).
Since it is often necessary to encode code points into bytes, instead of 16-bit integers, there are two flavors of UCS-2 which do that: USC-2BE (big-endian) and UCS-2LE (little-endian).
[Note: This is not the orthodox way of explaining surrogate pairs.]
Although UCS-2 does not support code points beyond U+FFFF, a hack called surrogate pairs was invented to allow such code points to safely pass through UCS-2 systems (e.g. file formats, databases, strings in some programming languages) in many cases.
When using this hack, a code point beyond U+FFFF is encoded as two code points in the reserved range U+D800 through U+DFFF. Each of these code points is then called a surrogate, and together they form a surrogate pair. Assuming that the reserved code points are not used in any other way, this format is identical to UTF-16.
When converting from UCS-2 to another encoding, it is a good idea to be aware of this hack. In most cases, sequences that look like surrogate pairs should be interpreted as such. One should keep in mind that UCS-2 systems generally aren't aware of UTF-16's rules, so it might be a bad idea to blindly interpret UCS-2 data as if it were UTF-16. For example, a string containing only the single code unit 0xDFFF is valid UCS-2, but invalid UTF-16.