Talk:Audio and Music
Rhetoric X (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
: Sounds good. Any chance you could knock together some basic editing guidelines for us, Jason? I've been limiting myself to just basic scaffolding at this point, imitating what you had already put up. -- [[User:Rhetoric X|Rhetoric X]] ([[User talk:Rhetoric X|talk]]) 22:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC) | : Sounds good. Any chance you could knock together some basic editing guidelines for us, Jason? I've been limiting myself to just basic scaffolding at this point, imitating what you had already put up. -- [[User:Rhetoric X|Rhetoric X]] ([[User talk:Rhetoric X|talk]]) 22:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I was wondering what the feeling is on pulling in extant documents and wikifying them? I've been linking to various file format specs, but I'm concerned that those links have an expiry date. It would be nice to take them and stick them in a sub-page (e.g. S3M/Specification) just so we've got a backup. --[[User:Halftheisland|Halftheisland]] ([[User talk:Halftheisland|talk]]) 02:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:16, 29 October 2012
I'm not sure how formal this whole effort is in terms of rules / guidelines, but I figure I should take a minute to explain how I intend to organise this page. If anyone has a better system I'm happy to talk about implementing that instead.
We're obviously going to have massive trouble with ambiguity, given the relatively small number of filenames and the vast number of different kinds of files (to pick just one example, a ".ps" file might be a PostScript document or an Amiga module created by Paul Shields).
For the Audio section, as you can see, I've picked up from whoever started it and kept on with the format FILE EXTENSION (Brief Description). For the most part, I intend to create new pages simply at FILE EXTENSION. When ambiguity arises, I've been turning FILE EXTENSION into a disambiguation page and creating new pages using Brief Description, then altering the links on the main page to "Brief Description|FILE EXTENSION" - see "PSF" for example.
Anway, that was boring, but I thought I should explain my thinking. --Halftheisland (talk) 19:56, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm functioning as Final Editor on this project (unlike most Wikis), so there's a solid voice and less time spent bickering. Your system makes sense, and that's how we've been doing it for everything. The intent is to use Categories to help people coming in from sideways issues, like "I have a pile of cartridges, what is on these" or "I have a floppy disk, what kind of floppy disk could it possibly be".
- --Jason Scott (talk) 22:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- Sounds good. Any chance you could knock together some basic editing guidelines for us, Jason? I've been limiting myself to just basic scaffolding at this point, imitating what you had already put up. -- Rhetoric X (talk) 22:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- I was wondering what the feeling is on pulling in extant documents and wikifying them? I've been linking to various file format specs, but I'm concerned that those links have an expiry date. It would be nice to take them and stick them in a sub-page (e.g. S3M/Specification) just so we've got a backup. --Halftheisland (talk) 02:16, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
