Talk:XMP
From Just Solve the File Format Problem
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "I just don't agree with calling XMP a metaformat. It's not exactly ''wrong'' -- for example, you could think of XMP/TIFF and XMP/Exif as independent formats that are based on ...") |
Dan Tobias (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I just don't agree with calling XMP a metaformat. It's not exactly ''wrong'' -- for example, you could think of XMP/TIFF and XMP/Exif as independent formats that are based on the XMP metaformat. But a single XMP "file" often contains both of these formats, so that thinking doesn't really work very well. [[User:Jsummers|Jsummers]] ([[User talk:Jsummers|talk]]) 00:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | I just don't agree with calling XMP a metaformat. It's not exactly ''wrong'' -- for example, you could think of XMP/TIFF and XMP/Exif as independent formats that are based on the XMP metaformat. But a single XMP "file" often contains both of these formats, so that thinking doesn't really work very well. [[User:Jsummers|Jsummers]] ([[User talk:Jsummers|talk]]) 00:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Which category does it belong in? [[Metadata]], or one of the metadata subsections of another category? [[User:Dan Tobias|Dan Tobias]] ([[User talk:Dan Tobias|talk]]) 05:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:08, 1 October 2013
I just don't agree with calling XMP a metaformat. It's not exactly wrong -- for example, you could think of XMP/TIFF and XMP/Exif as independent formats that are based on the XMP metaformat. But a single XMP "file" often contains both of these formats, so that thinking doesn't really work very well. Jsummers (talk) 00:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Which category does it belong in? Metadata, or one of the metadata subsections of another category? Dan Tobias (talk) 05:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
