Talk:XMP
From Just Solve the File Format Problem
(Difference between revisions)
Dan Tobias (Talk | contribs) |
Dan Tobias (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Which category does it belong in? [[Metadata]], or one of the metadata subsections of another category? [[User:Dan Tobias|Dan Tobias]] ([[User talk:Dan Tobias|talk]]) 05:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | :Which category does it belong in? [[Metadata]], or one of the metadata subsections of another category? [[User:Dan Tobias|Dan Tobias]] ([[User talk:Dan Tobias|talk]]) 05:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :OK, I see you put it in Metadata, so I added it to that page. [[User:Dan Tobias|Dan Tobias]] ([[User talk:Dan Tobias|talk]]) 05:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:13, 1 October 2013
I just don't agree with calling XMP a metaformat. It's not exactly wrong -- for example, you could think of XMP/TIFF and XMP/Exif as independent formats that are based on the XMP metaformat. But a single XMP "file" often contains both of these formats, so that thinking doesn't really work very well. Jsummers (talk) 00:06, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- Which category does it belong in? Metadata, or one of the metadata subsections of another category? Dan Tobias (talk) 05:08, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- OK, I see you put it in Metadata, so I added it to that page. Dan Tobias (talk) 05:13, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
