Keurig 2.0
Dan Tobias (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{FormatInfo |formattype=physical |subcat=Bar codes |released=2014 }} One wouldn't think that coffee and coffeemakers were subject to file format issues, but the '''Keurig 2.0...") |
Dan Tobias (Talk | contribs) (→Links) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* [http://hackaday.com/2014/12/10/dead-simple-hack-allows-for-rebel-keurig-k-cups/ Dead Simple Hack Allows for “Rebel” Keurig K-Cups] | * [http://hackaday.com/2014/12/10/dead-simple-hack-allows-for-rebel-keurig-k-cups/ Dead Simple Hack Allows for “Rebel” Keurig K-Cups] | ||
* [http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Dec/37 Full Disclosure] | * [http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Dec/37 Full Disclosure] | ||
| + | * [https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150203/05443529888/keurig-competitor-offers-free-hack-workaround-keurigs-absurd-java-bean-drm.shtml Keurig Competitor Offers Free Hack Workaround For Keurig's Absurd Java Bean DRM] | ||
Revision as of 17:24, 4 February 2015
One wouldn't think that coffee and coffeemakers were subject to file format issues, but the Keurig 2.0 coffeemakers released in 2014 were, unlike earlier versions of the single-cup coffeemakers of that brand, subject to an obnoxious form of digital rights management that scanned the cover of the coffee packaging to ensure that only true Keurig-licensed coffee was used. This apparently involved optical scanning of some sort of code on the cover, perhaps the Keurig logo. Supposedly this includes some manner of distinguishing varieties within the product line (coffee vs. tea, different sizes, etc.) in order to set the machine properly, but the main purpose seems to be to try to stop people from using competing coffee pods that don't pay a fee to Keurig.
