Talk:Graphics
From Just Solve the File Format Problem
(Difference between revisions)
Rhetoric X (Talk | contribs) |
(→(JPEG2000 code stream): new section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: Done. -- [[User:Rhetoric X|Rhetoric X]] ([[User talk:Rhetoric X|talk]]) 19:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | :: Done. -- [[User:Rhetoric X|Rhetoric X]] ([[User talk:Rhetoric X|talk]]) 19:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == (JPEG2000 code stream) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've moved this is raster (from unclassified). | ||
| + | Argument: if its a the graphics aspect we care about its a raster image, if its the code stream, it might actually be a data object, not graphics. | ||
Revision as of 18:30, 19 November 2012
in this list (http://justsolve.archiveteam.org/index.php/Graphics) JPG is listed as a BMP format. I would argue its not a bit mapped image format. Raster yes, bmp no....
- Does 'Raster' need to be a separate category then? Dan Tobias (talk) 07:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Is this distinction (which I understand from a technical point of view, I should add) really relevant enough to warrant a separate category? Perhaps the solution is to rename the whole category to raster graphics formats? --Nitro2k01 (talk) 12:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- I'd support renaming category to Raster. swanQ
- Done. -- Rhetoric X (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
(JPEG2000 code stream)
I've moved this is raster (from unclassified). Argument: if its a the graphics aspect we care about its a raster image, if its the code stream, it might actually be a data object, not graphics.
