Talk:PETSCII

I made some changes to note that "PET ASCII" is an incorrect term and that it is an extension, not a variety, of ASCII. It really shouldn't be under the ASCII subhead in the encodings page, unless we're going to include all the ASCII-like encodings, such as UTF-8, ISO 8859, and ISO 646 there. --Gmcgath (talk) 23:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)